Enjoy, if you can.
Investor Outlook, December 2007
Bill Gross
The Shadow Knows
or if you wish to just sit back and listen, click here The Shadow Knows audio
An irreverent financial and athletic journey
WASHINGTON -- In unveiling a plan to help more than one million struggling homeowners, the Bush administration and the mortgage industry have embarked on a controversial project: picking winners and losers from the rubble of the subprime-mortgage meltdown.
Under the deal, formally released yesterday, the industry would voluntarily help as many as 1.2 million homeowners who are heading for trouble paying their subprime mortgages but aren't yet lost causes. For some homeowners, loan-servicing companies will agree to freeze mortgages at their low introductory rates. In other cases, credit counselors or loan servicers will walk mortgage holders through refinancing processes.
The deal won't provide relief to many subprime-mortgage holders: These include borrowers who are now in foreclosure, have already refinanced their homes or are more than 60 days delinquent on more than one payment over the past year. In some cases, people with good credit scores will be excluded. Also left out are those deemed able to afford the higher interest rates scheduled to replace their introductory rates over the next two years.
The initiative could help stabilize falling home prices and rising foreclosure rates, buoy the mortgage market and provide a modicum of comfort to investors watching the housing crisis bleed into the broader economy.
But it also sets what promises to become a battle line as the subprime crisis plays out over the coming election year. Some critics, especially Democrats, say the plan doesn't go far enough to protect vulnerable homeowners against foreclosure. Others, including some homeowners, as well as those who have watched from the sidelines as home prices have soared in recent years, charge that the plan amounts to a bailout for financially reckless borrowers.

By Gonzalo Vina and Sebastian Boyd
Dec. 4 (Bloomberg) -- Citigroup Inc., the biggest U.S. bank by assets, lost more money than it made from financial instruments based on U.S. subprime mortgages, a senior company executive said in a meeting at the British Parliament.
William Mills, chief executive officer of Citigroup's markets and banking division in Europe, said his bank had suffered ``reputational damage'' from the fallout even though the New York-based company had made ``adequate disclosures'' to customers who were trading subprime-related securities including collateralized debt obligations.
``Our losses greatly exceeded the profits we made in this field over several years,'' Mills said at a hearing of the Treasury Committee today.
Citigroup has been without a CEO since Charles O. ``Chuck'' Prince III quit last month after the bank announced $8 billion to $11 billion of writedowns on mortgage investments. That may cut fourth-quarter profit by up to $7 billion, the bank said. The company is searching for a new CEO and the candidates include Vikram Pandit, head of Citigroup's subprime division.
``The end buyers of these instruments were sophisticated institutions that were given the opportunity to review the documents associated with them,'' Mills said. ``We've taken our fair share of losses on this.''
Jeremy Palmer, who runs UBS AG's investment banking unit in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, told the committee Switzerland's biggest bank probably also lost more than it made.
`We Made Money'
Gerald Corrigan, the managing director in charge of risk management at Goldman Sachs Group Inc., said that his bank had fared better than Citi.
``On balance, we probably made money,'' Corrigan told lawmakers. ``We have had a measure of success in hedging some of our exposure.''
Corrigan said that disruptions akin to the subprime crisis could happen again even if bankers devote ``relentless energy'' towards preventing them.
``It is the nature of things, sad but true, that these periodic disruptions will occur,'' he said. ``We have to be honest enough to recognize that as hard as we work at this, sometime in the future another surprise will occur.''
``Mistakes were made, there is no question about that,'' said Corrigan.
Deutsche Bank probably made more money from marketing CDOs than it lost, said Charles Aldington, chairman of its London unit.
The committee has also called Hector Sants, CEO of the Financial Services Authority, Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling, banking industry lobbying groups and Bank of England Governor Mervyn King.
It is true that in the last two days the US stock market has recovered sharply after a significant 10% downward correction in the period from early October until Monday. But the most sensible interpretation of the upward move on Tuesday and Wednesday this week (in spite of an onslaught of lousy macro news: consumer confidence, existing home sales, Beige Book, fall in durable goods orders, regional Fed manufacturing reports, initial claims for unemployment benefits, expectations that Q4 growth will be closer to 0% after the revised 4.9% in Q3, sharply rising credit losses, falling home prices and a worsening housing recession, etc.) is that this is the last leg of a sucker's rally (or dead cat's bounce) driven by wishful hopes that the Fed easing will prevent a recession.
Welcome to my blog. For this first posting I will give you a little of my background via some quick life highlights. I was raised in Midland, TX (yep, 180 degrees away from Boulder, CO). I grabbed my High School Diploma on the way out the door to Colorado, where my real adventure begins.